Liberating Minds

Home­Portal­Calendar­FAQ­Search­Register­Memberlist­Usergroups­Log in
Post new topic   Reply to topicShare | 
 

 The way back home

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Goto page : 1, 2, 3  Next
AuthorMessage
jawol(48)



Number of posts: 83
Registration date: 2008-11-16

PostSubject: The way back home   Tue Jun 16, 2009 5:54 pm

I am submitting this post in the hope that even if only one person who has defoo'd makes a call home to re-engage their family, it is worth while and hope that other parents or family members will also add messages of love and good will to their missing one's.

As Nelle has said 'Parents never really stop loving their kids' you have nothing to lose by contacting home or even just other family members.
How can you gain from getting back together and what will that feel like?
Did you really set out to hurt your family?
Where are you now and where will you be this time next year?
You might have Aunts and Uncles, sibblings or Grand Parents that can help bridge the way back.
You can leave a message on the answer 'phone.
You can send a letter.
You can send an e-mail
You can ask a friend to help.
You can ask them to come to you.
You can simply 'turn up'.
Mum and Dad are not going to be cross with you.
Mum and Dad are going to be relieved and so will you.
Will you? make that call and let the love flow and feel the goodness within.
What have you got left to lose?

Jawol(48)
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Waiting



Number of posts: 28
Registration date: 2008-08-29

PostSubject: Re: The way back home   Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:34 pm

Thank you for posting that Jawol(48). I second what you said. If my son walked through the door right now, I would hug him and try to find out what we could do to mend our relationship and what could be done to help him want to have a relationship with us. I would be happy with a phone call occasionally, just to know he's O.K. I hope it's not too late. I've learned a lot in the past year, mainly from LiMi, and am willing to work through any issues. I felt I was willing before, but I understand a lot more now.
I will never stop loving him or being proud of him.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
jawol(48)



Number of posts: 83
Registration date: 2008-11-16

PostSubject: Re: The way back home   Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:08 pm

Hi Waiting,
Good for you and you hold on to that belief with all your might. Use your imagination to help you through and seek as much guidance as you can. Its out there if you care to look for it. You are in good company here.
Yes, limi have been a great help to us also and faults can be remedied. You probably hold the answers to your questions but you just haven't asked yourself the right questions yet.

Regards,
Jawol (48)
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Conrad



Number of posts: 5114
Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Registration date: 2007-07-22

PostSubject: Re: The way back home   Wed Jun 17, 2009 7:35 am

Waiting wrote:
Thank you for posting that Jawol(48). I second what you said. If my son walked through the door right now, I would hug him and try to find out what we could do to mend our relationship and what could be done to help him want to have a relationship with us. I would be happy with a phone call occasionally, just to know he's O.K. I hope it's not too late. I've learned a lot in the past year, mainly from LiMi, and am willing to work through any issues. I felt I was willing before, but I understand a lot more now.

thanks Waiting, that's very nice to hear, and I hope you and your child will get the chance to work through things.

_________________
My Blog
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://koenswinkels.weebly.com/index.html
Forget Me Not



Number of posts: 27
Registration date: 2008-11-18

PostSubject: Re: The way back home   Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:28 am

Reading your post Jawol 48 made me cry, if only it would help even one of all our relations it would be marvelous. This experience has brought home the immense love and devotion I have for the young person I have lost contact with, and I know it will never leave me.

Takecare all you parents out there who are going through this, especially you dads today! Deep down inside I'm sure they stiill love us.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Chaohinon



Number of posts: 2
Registration date: 2009-06-21

PostSubject: Re: The way back home   Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:41 am

jawol(48) wrote:
Did you really set out to hurt your family?
A question like this is entirely self-damning. Your child would not have cut off contact if they weren't feeling hurt themselves, whether it be from a specific event or a gradual unfolding of events.

And even assuming that your child is consciously trying to hurt you, have you taken the time to ask why that would be? Either of yourself, of your child, or of others who may have relevant accounts to share.

I think it's easy to forget what a tremendous security blanket family (in most cases, anyhow) represents. And for someone - especially someone who hasn't outgrown dependency on authority figures - to flee from it takes a lot. Venturing into the world can be frightening for some, and it must have taken something infinitely more so to drive them away.

I think if you truly care for the person you've lost, you would want to ask what may have happened to cause such a schism. Pointing your finger at some obscure libertarian podcast stands out as a blatant attempt to evade the heart of the matter. This is not to say that it's immediately your fault, but the situation just begging for a careful and thorough consideration of that which parents so often gloss over.

Quote:
Mum and Dad are not going to be cross with you.
You left out a piece of that statement, something that still comes across in the message.

"Mum and Dad are not going to be cross with you, this time."

By saying this, you're admitting that you know your child is fearful of their parents regarding him with some sort of condemnation or shame.

When you put this in the context of an adult to a very young or adolescent child, it's the emotional equivalent of saying, "King Kong won't rip you to pieces if you trespass on his island, this time."

I know if I'm working at a place where I'm regularly treated with scorn, I'm not going to stick around any longer than it takes for me to survive. Why Mum and Dad should be treated any differently is beyond me. It's simple human dignity to not subject yourself to that if you don't have to.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
nelle



Number of posts: 479
Registration date: 2009-02-09

PostSubject: Re: The way back home   Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:54 am

Hi Chaohinon,

Thank you for your thoughtful post. I am sorry if you are one who was mistreated by your parents. This is very sad and unfortunate. The mistreatment or abuse of children is never acceptable. You have my sympathy and empathy. I am also one who was treated in ways that perhaps I should not have been as a child. When I talked about this with a dear friend, I was lead to FDR. Before long, I found myself gathering courage to defoo from my father. You see, in our house my mother was often angry with us, and said things that could have been considered verbally abusive, and she spanked us. Our father was out of the house working most of the time, and though he was aware that these things happened, did not stop them from happening. My mother is no longer living, but I was told that my father was responsible for what had happened, and that I should cut ties for my emotional health. After that, I found myself cutting ties with my sister as well. I was told I was courageous when I cut those ties, because, according to what I was lead to believe, I was taking steps in breaking the cycle of abuse.

However, through much counseling I was able to discover that there were other ways to break that cycle, and I didn't have to break those ties. I could talk with them, and discuss what happened in the past. We could work through the situation together in a caring, loving manner.

I have found that approaching them and having these conversations has taken much courage and has made huge steps toward permanently healing our family.

It is difficult for parents to understand what the problems are if their children just leave without explaining and attempting to have these conversations in an open and reciprocal fashion, perhaps with the help of a caring therapist. Leaving and refusing to talk with parents ever again is not the solution. When I defoo'd, there was a part of me that missed my father and sister very much. Now that I have returned to the relationships with them, and made the effort to make sure that those relationships are healthier than they were before, life is much better for all of us in our family.

I wish you well and hope for healing and wholeness in your situation, whatever it may be.

Nelle
Back to top Go down
View user profile
QuestEon



Number of posts: 542
Registration date: 2008-03-25

PostSubject: Re: The way back home   Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:56 am

Chaohinon wrote:
jawol(48) wrote:
Did you really set out to hurt your family?
A question like this is entirely self-damning. Your child would not have cut off contact if they weren't feeling hurt themselves, whether it be from a specific event or a gradual unfolding of events.

And even assuming that your child is consciously trying to hurt you, have you taken the time to ask why that would be? Either of yourself, of your child, or of others who may have relevant accounts to share.

I think it's easy to forget what a tremendous security blanket family (in most cases, anyhow) represents. And for someone - especially someone who hasn't outgrown dependency on authority figures - to flee from it takes a lot. Venturing into the world can be frightening for some, and it must have taken something infinitely more so to drive them away.

I think if you truly care for the person you've lost, you would want to ask what may have happened to cause such a schism. Pointing your finger at some obscure libertarian podcast stands out as a blatant attempt to evade the heart of the matter. This is not to say that it's immediately your fault, but the situation just begging for a careful and thorough consideration of that which parents so often gloss over.

Hi, Chaohinon!

Welcome! I appreciated your thoughtful post and I hope it is the first of many. I'm not going to challenge anything you said above because I agree with you 100%--every single word. I don't think you can really understand the child who leaves his or her family until you understand what a tremendously terrifying and painful step it must have been--a desperate step people take when they believe they have no other choice.

And as much as I think jawol(48)'s post is a loving post, that particular question--"Did you really set out to hurt your family?" is one that may backfire for the reasons you suggest.

In fact, I think the values you're talking about (having a clear understanding of how everyone is experiencing the family) are so important, they're universal--they should exist on both sides.

Unfortunately, people who become associated with FDR are given equally insensitive claims about the hurt their families experience following a defoo. These claims--and most attempts by Molyneux/FDR to extend the defoo--bring the issues no closer to resolution than ignoring the pain of the child before the defoo.

Stefan Molyneux repeatedly--as sweeping generalities--counsels defooers that the family isn't hurt when they leave. Or if there is pain, it isn't real or legitimate. Repeatedly, he has used clever phrases such as "you don't defoo your family, they defoo you." He characterizes the anguished attempts of the family to reach out to their child as simply the wailing and gnashing of teeth of those who have lost their ability to control or humiliate. He counsels defooers to cut off all communications, which incidentally also shields them from seeing first hand what the family is experiencing.

Any attempt by Molyneux to claim he does this on a case-by-case basis is clearly false. In books such as "On Truth," and many, many podcasts, he makes blanket condemnations of parents and families.

If it is wrong for parents to ask a defooed child "did you set out to hurt your family?" without really understanding what the child has gone through, it is just as wrong for a counselor to consistently claim--"go ahead and leave--your parents don't understand you anyway and you aren't going to be hurting them in a way that really matters."

Because in summary, that is Molyneux's opinion and that is his advice.

My question has always been--once the defooed child has made his/her escape, once they've established the separate peace they need and deserve for their mental health, what next? If hanging around FDR is the answer, then why do the closest members of Molyneux's inner circle seem no happier today--and in fact are still posting with their same family complaints--than the day they joined FDR? (In my opinion, the longer they stay, the worse the family complaints actually become!)

Clearly, clearly there are unresolved feelings. For those who have such feelings, why not just say to their families: "I left because I felt I had to. I'm not apologizing for it and I'd be disappointed if you didn't make an earnest attempt to understand why. However, I do have unresolved feelings. Some of them are anger. Some of them could be love. I'm willing to do the work to see if we can have a family relationship, but only if you are prepared to do the same. If so, then we all need to go into counseling together and resolve these feelings and I need your commitment that you will fully participate. This is the only available, non-negotiable, next step for us--take it or leave it."

That seems so extraordinarily common-sense to me. Yet, in hundreds of thousands of posts on FDR and in over a thousand podcasts, I've never seen it seriously suggested--not once--that troubled families should seek counseling. Only separation.

Why is that, do you suppose?

_________________
-Q.E.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
NonEntity



Number of posts: 2594
Registration date: 2007-11-08

PostSubject: Re: The way back home   Mon Jul 06, 2009 4:33 pm

"common sense" is an oxymoron

But aside from that HUGE blunder, you make an excellent post, QuestEon. Laughing

- NonE
Back to top Go down
View user profile
nelle



Number of posts: 479
Registration date: 2009-02-09

PostSubject: Re: The way back home   Mon Jul 06, 2009 11:47 pm

Reconciliation and peace are well worth the effort, and are far preferable to silence and estrangement.


Last edited by nelle on Tue Jul 07, 2009 12:06 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Chaohinon



Number of posts: 2
Registration date: 2009-06-21

PostSubject: Re: The way back home   Mon Jul 06, 2009 11:59 pm

I hope this doesn't mark me as being some sort of Molyneuvian robot, but I have to ask why the responsibility of reconciliation is heaped on the child. Sure, if they feel that's their preferred course of action, then by all means have at it. But if someone has continually been beaten down throughout their upbringing, it strikes me as a tad fucked up to wag your finger at them for not wanting to reconcile. And if said reconciliation turns out to be a resounding success, it just begs the question of why the parents couldn't have just treated the defooer fairly to begin with.

If it takes the threat of ostracism to get someone to treat you with dignity and openness, then can it be said that they truly love and respect you? That strikes me as being more of just a weird, superficial attachment to a person's presence than actual love for them as an individual.

You guys seem to be conflating one person actively hurting the other with one person simply feeling hurt. I may feel hurt that Person X doesn't want to be around me, but they're entirely within their rights to disengage (or not engage to begin with). It cannot be said that they're hurting me, since that would require action. Disengaging from a relationship is not actively hurting someone, as it's a lack of action.

As for why Stef tends to recommend separation (though, btw, he does often urge counseling and engagement. I can think of one instance off the top of my head, and I'll go digging if you really want me to), it probably comes down to the matter of unchosen obligations. This is a core libertarian/anarchist principle, that simply because some figure may demand something from you, you're obligated to give in. In the case of the corporatocracy, said figure happens to have a massive array of guns and spy technology, so giving in may be your best option, purely as a defense against worse things to come. In the case of parents, they have an arsenal of fragile emotional triggers on hand, which are equally as insidious and powerful. Giving into them may work as a short-term defense mechanism, but just as with state power grinding against the free market, familial piety hinders the growth of the individual.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Phlogiston



Number of posts: 620
Location: NOLA
Registration date: 2007-10-25

PostSubject: Re: The way back home   Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:56 am

Chaohinon wrote:
In the case of parents, they have an arsenal of fragile emotional triggers on hand, which are equally as insidious and powerful. Giving into them may work as a short-term defense mechanism, but just as with state power grinding against the free market, familial piety hinders the growth of the individual.

I hope you realize I am a fringe member here. I always thought I had an arsenal to use against my parents just as tough and even tougher than they had aganst me. I know teen hobos and teen runaways who are still not Stef Defoo's. They don't feel like victims. They feel empowered and more powerful than their parents.
Why does one who feels their parents are abusive feel subjugate to them? They should feel empowered. Hence no need to DEEFO only to liberate ones self. At that point the term are all yours as to the relationship.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
QuestEon



Number of posts: 542
Registration date: 2008-03-25

PostSubject: Re: The way back home   Tue Jul 07, 2009 5:59 am

Chaohinon wrote:
I hope this doesn't mark me as being some sort of Molyneuvian robot

If you were a Molyneuvian robot, you wouldn't be posting here and considering alternative points of view. Very Happy

Chaohinon wrote:
but I have to ask why the responsibility of reconciliation is heaped on the child. Sure, if they feel that's their preferred course of action, then by all means have at it. But if someone has continually been beaten down throughout their upbringing, it strikes me as a tad fucked up to wag your finger at them for not wanting to reconcile. And if said reconciliation turns out to be a resounding success, it just begs the question of why the parents couldn't have just treated the defooer fairly to begin with.

Well, remember that we're talking in generalities here. Every case is individual and specific. The reason that it is often left up to the child to reconcile in the case of a defoo is because at that point all communication has been cut off. Every parental attempt at communication is often discussed on FDR as a "FOO attack" or "FOO invasion." I don't think there's any finger wagging here--it's simply the nature of a defoo. Often, the parents are hoping for a reconciliation daily. Molyneux's own brother has been begging for one but is ignored.

Regarding the idea of parents treating their children fairly or unfairly, however, one of my fundamental problems with Molyneux is that his definition of abuse covers a wider range of behaviors than that from "family expert" I've encountered.

The inescapable conclusion of "On Truth" is that if your parents believe in any kind of religion or government, then they have no workable concept of good and evil and are therefore abusive.

And that gets back to the danger of dealing with generalities. While I'm not comfortable dealing with generalities when it comes to family problems, Molyneux is--in a way that I don't think is particularly beneficial. People come to FDR with a wide range of family backgrounds but they are all told (in works like "On Truth" or in podcasts like "But my parents are nice,") that they are abuse victims. Any of the widely varying complaints they post about their parents/families receive the same universal level of sympathetic reaction given to abuse victims.

And so I can't really tell you about why or how or whether, in a particular case, a parent is treating a child fairly or unfairly and what the child can do about it. All I can do is point out that--based on what is clearly there in the books and podcasts--the viewpoint of FDR is that (statistically speaking) nearly ALL parents are abusive. I wonder how that can be any kind of real solution.

Chaohinon wrote:
If it takes the threat of ostracism to get someone to treat you with dignity and openness, then can it be said that they truly love and respect you? That strikes me as being more of just a weird, superficial attachment to a person's presence than actual love for them as an individual.

Again, it's very hard to answer that kind of question with generalities. One thing I do know is that people often misread how they treat each other. What if the parent wants to and truly believes they are treating a child with dignity and openness but the child is experiencing it or perceiving differently?

And I hasten to add that doesn't mean the child is wrong. The child is absolutely right from his/her perspective and absolutely shouldn't just grin and bear it.

I think that happens quite often. That's why people sometimes need a professional--someone who understands that people all have different communication needs, someone who can help parents adjust to the rapidly changing differences in what their child/young adult needs at that particular point.

Chaohinon wrote:
You guys seem to be conflating one person actively hurting the other with one person simply feeling hurt. I may feel hurt that Person X doesn't want to be around me, but they're entirely within their rights to disengage (or not engage to begin with). It cannot be said that they're hurting me, since that would require action. Disengaging from a relationship is not actively hurting someone, as it's a lack of action.

I genuinely hope I'm not conflating that, because that would be wrong. What I am doing is challenging the notion of actively hurting.

Again, this is where we'll trip over generalities. It's true that nearly ALL health-care professionals acknowledge the need for defooing (although they wouldn't call it that!) in some cases. If you have a parent that is actively and purposefully hurting a child, it's the only option. If you have a parent that is actively and uncontrollably (perhaps due to a mental illness) hurting a child, it may be the time to go.

But if you have a parent who truly loves a child but is unwittingly hurting him/her (and there could be thousands of reasons for that, some quite understandable), what do you do then?

Again, I think that's case-by-case and requires some kind of professional or outside intervention between that child and that particular parent.

My quarrel with FDR is there is no attempt to discover, no attempt at curiousity for these things. All parental complaints by board members are treated as parental abuse, case closed.

What's worse, it's not just one parent who gets indicted. Molyneux has consistently made the claim that there is no such thing as one good parent and one bad parent. Quite often, communication with the entire extended family, siblings included, are cut off even when the relationship problem is between a child and one parent only. I don't know of a health-care professional who advocates that or can explain why that's a good idea.

Chaohinon wrote:
As for why Stef tends to recommend separation (though, btw, he does often urge counseling and engagement. I can think of one instance off the top of my head, and I'll go digging if you really want me to),

Yes, please--I would be thrilled to hear that. I'd like one example where Molyneux says "It doesn't sound like abuse to me. I suggest you and your parents go to counseling together to work this out." Or anything like that. I KNOW I have an example of him saying just the opposite.

Chaohinon wrote:
it probably comes down to the matter of unchosen obligations. This is a core libertarian/anarchist principle, that simply because some figure may demand something from you, you're obligated to give in. In the case of the corporatocracy, said figure happens to have a massive array of guns and spy technology, so giving in may be your best option, purely as a defense against worse things to come. In the case of parents, they have an arsenal of fragile emotional triggers on hand, which are equally as insidious and powerful. Giving into them may work as a short-term defense mechanism, but just as with state power grinding against the free market, familial piety hinders the growth of the individual.

I agree with you that that is a possibility. And in cases where the parent's actions are unhealthy for the child, I agree with you whole-heartedly. Nevertheless, I could also read your last paragraph almost as an indictment of families in general and the parent's entire relationship with the child as one of pulling these "fragile emotional triggers."

All I know is that we evolved as humans in families long before politics existed. I believe there is something foundational and fundamental about families that can't be swept aside by someone's new theories of anarcho-capitalism. I'm not talking about sentimentality here, I'm talking about science. There's something about families that is intrinsically and inextricably essential to our development--and I don't think it necessarily stops when the child reaches 18.

I think it's worth the effort--even if it means bringing in an outsider--to consider all options to save a family before completely discarding it. And I have no qualms with discarding it after all other options are considered.

And I also have no quarrel with a child making a decision to cut and run if they truly believe they have no alternative. But after the freedom--what do you do with those feelings? I see absolutely no evidence--six or seven years on--that Molyneux has resolved his own feelings about his brother, mother, and father. Why else does he continue talking about them? Therefore, I find his blanket advice to never revisit those feelings with the family (guided by a professional), at minimum, highly suspect.

That's why I ask, after a defoo--what next?

_________________
-Q.E.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
jawol(48)



Number of posts: 83
Registration date: 2008-11-16

PostSubject: Re: The way back home   Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:39 am

[quote="Chaohinon"]
jawol(48) wrote:
Did you really set out to hurt your family?
A question like this is entirely self-damning. Your child would not have cut off contact if they weren't feeling hurt themselves, whether it be from a specific event or a gradual unfolding of events.
[b]Jawol wrote[/b],
I agree Chaohinon and fully recognise where faults lay and relish a chance at reconciliation. However, to my knowledge these 'faults' for want of a better phrase, were not in the foreground of our lives until a certain website got involved and interfered with our relationships.
Chaohinon wrote,
I think it's easy to forget what a tremendous security blanket family (in most cases, anyhow) represents. And for someone - especially someone who hasn't outgrown dependency on authority figures - to flee from it takes a lot. Venturing into the world can be frightening for some, and it must have taken something infinitely more so to drive them away.
[b]Jawol wrote,[/b]
I agree once again and would cheerfully offer support to my missing relation if so desired, irrespective of what that person thinks of me.
As for being 'driven away' I believe 'enticed away' might be more appropriate but I do not wish this post to appear as if it is just for my circumstance. I am just trying to generalise here and want to encourage people to try and re-engage their family.

Chaohinon wrote
Quote:
Mum and Dad are not going to be cross with you.
You left out a piece of that statement, something that still comes across in the message.

"Mum and Dad are not going to be cross with you, this time."

By saying this, you're admitting that you know your child is fearful of their parents regarding him with some sort of condemnation or shame.
Jawol wrote
It concerns me that people may be fearful of their parents reaction to their situation, especially those that have not taken the time to investigate their particulars.,
Parents need to comprehend and acknwoledge their individual situation in order that they may understand reason, and not just 'this time' every time. A little difficult to do if nobody's taliking don't you think.

So maybe you might be thinking that re-engaging with family and friends might be worth a shot, what next? how are you going to set about it?
Well you could start by arranging a meeting on neutral ground but somewhere convenient to both parties.
You could give each other an agenda of what you would like to discuss and not discuss.
I would make the first meeting a short one, say an hour or so, just to break the ice.
I would go away from that meeting and then reflect on it, give consideration to what has been said, say for a week or so before meeting again.
Perhaps you could carry on with the above and gradually reduce the times between meetings remembering to stick to anything that is agreed.
Show each other respect and understanding.
Oh and don't forget a box of tissues, me thinks this will be an exceptoinally emotional process.

So Chahinon, with respect,assuming you have defoo'd and if you have I hope that you can find solution, how would you go about re-engaging your family and friends?.[b]
Back to top Go down
View user profile
jawol(48)



Number of posts: 83
Registration date: 2008-11-16

PostSubject: Re: The way back home   Tue Aug 04, 2009 6:02 pm

In continuing this post it is my intention to try and deliver a message of good will and faith to the defoo’d that pass this way.
It has come to my attention that a question sometimes asked of our missing relations is ‘why or how will you miss me?’ I consider this to be well worthy of a response, after all this is about ‘them’ and not ‘us’.
In order to attempt a plausible response it would be frugal to go back to the very beginning of that person’s life.
So here you are, just arrived in the world, not really knowing or caring what is going on, just relying on your basic senses. But looking at you from above are 2 very proud people, your parents. They smile at each other, hold hands and view this wonderful baby with admiration for it is theirs and theirs alone. They are responsible for its well being and have now assumed the role of parenthood. There are some precious moments to be remembered straight away. The first cuddle with little fingers open and closing, reaching out and grasping at air. You place one of your fingers into their tiny hands and they immediately grip it. You stroke the small crop of hair and wonder what colour it will be in ten years time.
So as we travel on our journey through the early years baby has to learn from us and indeed we have to learn from baby. We get to know what those different cry’s grimaces, smiles and chuckles all mean, all part of the bonding process.
Then there are the milestones along the way, the crawling, the first teeth, the first words, the first teetering steps of walking, all manner of triumphant things in which we rejoice in seeing baby do for the first time.
As baby grows into toddler what parent will forget the first days of school when for a few hours the closeness is broken and then brought back together, rushing towards you with a ‘I love you Mum/Dad’ and a hug that is meant for Mum and Dad and them alone.
Oh yes indeed, what things we as parents miss.
So the years roll by, the informative years where decent parents will do what they can to point their offspring in the right direction, to warn them of some of life’s dangers, to try and educate them as best we can. We play games in order that they may learn fair play and social skills with others. We answer endless amounts of confusing questions and in doing so have to resume our education as we realise that our child is leaving us behind educationally. What a revelation it has been for the parents of the children that have had to learn computer skills after their children have been taught them at school.
It is quite clear that in many homes it is now our children that teach us those skills.
How wonderful a world we have in which child can teach parent and parent can teach child. There are years full of memorable moments, hopefully many happy ones, birthdays, holidays and special occasions which are embedded in our memories and some captured in snap shots or on some form of recording device.
Moments that can be replayed a thousand times over in our minds or tucked away somewhere safe to be viewed in peace when time in later life permits.
We see our children mature into adults and set off into the working world, hopefully well equipped to deal with life in general. We look back and think have we done enough? Can we ever stop doing more for you so that you can have a better life than we ever did? No would be my answer as I guess a great many other parents would agree. We want to go on giving to you and when we can no longer do that we look back to the times when we could. The times when you would not reject us because we were all you had to look to in the beginning.
A time comes when the ‘Parenting’ stops, but actually being a ‘Parent’ will not cease, not at least until our final days.
Yes we have a great many things to miss, especially the laughter. A house full of laughter is a good place to be and we want that laughter and the happiness that caused it to return, and by that I mean YOU.
I know that this post could go on a lot longer and in more detail but I would like to think that my message is clear enough.
I think you can use your imagination to fill in the gaps, please feel free to do so.


Last edited by jawol(48) on Wed Aug 05, 2009 2:12 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile
 

The way back home

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 3Goto page : 1, 2, 3  Next

Permissions of this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Liberating Minds :: Intellectual :: Freedomain Radio :: Family and Friends of FDR'ers-
Post new topic   Reply to topic