Liberating Minds

Home­Portal­Calendar­FAQ­Search­Register­Memberlist­Usergroups­Log in
Post new topic   Reply to topicShare | 
 

 Vaccination information

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
NonEntity



Number of posts: 2598
Registration date: 2007-11-08

PostSubject: Vaccination information   Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:03 pm

Since KarenX seems to think that vaccinations are pretty good things, and everything I've been reading of late seems contrary to that opinion, I thought I'd post this information which came to me today which seems to be well researched and documented. For those who care to examine the material, go here: Natural News article with copious links and sources.



Natural News wrote:
Vaccines are the quackery of modern medicine. Mass vaccination programs not only fail to protect the population from infectious disease, they actually accelerate the spread of disease in many cases.

Many website have cropped up over the last few years to counter the pro-vaccine propaganda put out by drug companies (who profit from vaccines) and health regulators (who serve the drug companies). One of those sites is www.VaccinationDebate.com , which lists the following historical facts about vaccines:

• In the USA in 1960, two virologists discovered that both polio vaccines were contaminated with the SV 40 virus which causes cancer in animals as well as changes in human cell tissue cultures. Millions of children had been injected with these vaccines. (Med Jnl of Australia 17/3/1973 p555)

• In 1871-2, England, with 98% of the population aged between 2 and 50 vaccinated against smallpox, it experienced its worst ever smallpox outbreak with 45,000 deaths. During the same period in Germany, with a vaccination rate of 96%, there were over 125,000 deaths from smallpox. (http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/020...)
The Hadwen Documents

• In Germany, compulsory mass vaccination against diphtheria commenced in 1940 and by 1945 diphtheria cases were up from 40,000 to 250,000. (Don't Get Stuck, Hannah Allen)

• In 1967, Ghana was declared measles free by the World Health Organisation after 96% of its population was vaccinated. In 1972, Ghana experienced one of its worst measles outbreaks with its highest ever mortality rate. (Dr H Albonico, MMR Vaccine Campaign in Switzerland, March 1990)

• In 1977, Dr Jonas Salk who developed the first polio vaccine, testified along with other scientists, that mass inoculation against polio was the cause of most polio cases throughout the USA since 1961. (Science 4/4/77 "Abstracts" )


and on and on...

Njoy!

- NonE
Back to top Go down
View user profile
KarenX



Number of posts: 71
Registration date: 2009-02-24

PostSubject: Re: Vaccination information   Mon Aug 31, 2009 2:49 am

I don't think that Natural News, owned by Truth Publishing International (out of Taiwan), owned by Mike Adams, a self-proclaimed nutritionist with his own products to sell, is a very reliable source of information about epidemics or vaccines. Also, thirty-year-old statements to support his version of events is not very impressive--and any disease data from WWII in Germany is unreliable and anomalous.

Regarding the 1990 quote: It's from a Dr. H Albonico, who is only cited in that exact same sentence all over the web, with no first name or affiliation or any record online at all except for this very quote, and it directly contracts information from 2003, from the Journal of Infectious Diseases--a peer-reviewed publication--that says the following:

Quote:
By review of available literature, routine surveillance data, coverage surveys, and hospital records, measles control in Ghana was assessed since vaccinations began in 1978. Nationally, measles vaccination coverage increased from 24% in 1980 to 84% in 2000. This achievement is attributed to health sector reforms that included a higher district share of the total recurrent health budget from 20% in 1996 to 42% in 1999. The budget reallocation resulted in improved access to immunization services, supply procurement, transport management, staff motivation, and information flow. On the client side, the age of the child, socioeconomic status of parents, and type of prenatal care were associated with vaccination coverage. Routine vaccination coverage of >80% has resulted in lower measles incidence, a longer interepidemic interval, and a shift in cases to older children. Ghana recently developed a strategic plan to reduce measles deaths to near zero.


Regarding Dr. Jonas Salk: The number of polio cases from 1951 to 1955 was 37,864. From 1961 to 1965--after they perfected the vaccine--there were 570 cases, or a decrease of 99.98 %. Those people Jonas Salk was talking about probably did get polio from the vaccine. It's a known--and publicized--side effect. And before anyone brings it up, polio was not on a natural decline before the vaccine was developed.

If you want to have a real conversation about vaccines, you need real information. For the record, I am not going to lay out the case point by point for it. I am not even going to debate point by point over it, either. Call that what you want--cowardice, laziness, denial, whatever. But please be aware of what constitutes a good source of information and what constitutes facts when you set out to make a case.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://karenm77.wordpress.com
eye2i2



Number of posts: 697
Age: 56
Location: southeastern north america ;)
Registration date: 2008-09-02

PostSubject: Re: Vaccination information   Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:07 am

KarenX wrote:
If you want to have a real conversation about vaccines, you need real information.

Indeed. Wow, you talk about a proverbial mouthful in one sentence.

First, let me say, I'm not sure presently which side of this issue is the disinformation (including infommerical) versus the real info (including inDoctriNation). I look at what I've heard about The Riechtstag/Nationalsozialistische and Pearl Harbor/the nukes and The Northwoods Document, Slavery/Racism, (etc) on the one hand, then the contemporary likes of 9-11 and vaccines. How's a lowly net surfer to find the resources for determining the "real" from the Sociopath/Psychopath/Homeopath/etc?! Cui buno is difficult to assess from a computer chair. Not to even get into just what "gain" can mean to any particular individual(s).

NonE, on a more specific consideration, how does one who holds that The Government that has the resources and wherewithal to pull off the likes of 9-11, not equally consider that those resources could very well be being used in the vaccination arena (ie disinformation, oh say like providing/paying off/being the "researcher" for Nature's News*)? By comparison, how easy would that be to pull off?!

When I think of psychopaths at this level, who's to say which would be the more 'amusing' (valuable) to them, vaccinations being in fact bad --or-- it being bad to not be vaccinated?! *[I'm speaking only hypothetically of course; no intent to slander anyone; Nature's News just being already in the discussion; also, not to discount the potential with any individual per the Sev7n Deadly Sins list/temptations --where this works with ALL folks, real scientists/researchers included]

I often think of the scene in the classic old comic movie "Trading Places" (which starred Dan Akroyd & Eddie Murphy, among others). The whole premise of the movie centered around the 'social theory' (argument) of two rich Wall Street tycoon brothers, who were willing to manipulate (socially engineer) other people's lives for the whopping bet of $1 (one crisp FRN). Also significant, was the likes of this wasn't some dark smoked filled room/secret meeting per se, but rather was done in broad daylight, out amongst the boys meeting, business as usual at The Club (meeting place of the money makers). [the Boys did, cliche, enjoy their fine cigars]


I suspect/suppose it would be easy or tempting here to sluff off the core issue with a "Hmpf, believe what you want" reply. That of course is, ultimately the proverbial enchilada; I just am not sure it addresses the issue as might prove beneficial? --presumption aside as needed.

I would enjoy hearing of approaches to the issues like vaccinations and 9-11 other's use. With the caveat being, I don't wish to hear mere emotional blurts [see again as needed, my "peer experts" list sampler above]. But rather, how one methodically, scientifically sifts for the 'real information' (as best as that can be found; obviously and unfortunately it's seldom cut and dry; the very nature con scams won't allow that). Much like KarenX has done-- thus far, but perhaps not quite far enough yet? Wink
Back to top Go down
View user profile
NonEntity



Number of posts: 2598
Registration date: 2007-11-08

PostSubject: Re: Vaccination information   Mon Aug 31, 2009 12:32 pm

I didn't set out to make a case. I simply pointed out that there is another view and here is one source of information for those who care to investigate that view.

Perhaps you failed to notice the part where I said... "For those who care to examine..." Rolling Eyes

- NonE flower
Back to top Go down
View user profile
NonEntity



Number of posts: 2598
Registration date: 2007-11-08

PostSubject: Re: Vaccination information   Mon Aug 31, 2009 12:50 pm

KarenX wrote:
I don't think that Natural News, owned by Truth Publishing International (out of Taiwan), owned by Mike Adams, a self-proclaimed nutritionist with his own products to sell, is a very reliable source of information about epidemics or vaccines.


Regardless of the truth about the effectiveness of vaccination, I find the above statement to be really interesting. Are you implying that nutrition is of negative value? Are you implying that anyone selling a product is automatically evil?

As if the pharmaceutical companies, the A.M.A., the doctors, the pharmaceutical supply chains and retailers, and the government agencies are all without something to gain.

Very strange. Very strange.

- NonE
Back to top Go down
View user profile
eye2i2



Number of posts: 697
Age: 56
Location: southeastern north america ;)
Registration date: 2008-09-02

PostSubject: Re: Vaccination information   Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:18 pm

NonEntity wrote:
KarenX wrote:
... [is not] a very reliable source of information about epidemics or vaccines.
Are you implying that anyone selling a product is automatically evil?

Perhaps she framed her's (as you reminded you did your's in the preceding post)

Quote:
As if the pharmaceutical companies, the A.M.A., the doctors, the pharmaceutical supply chains and retailers, and the government agencies are all without something to gain.
Very strange. Very strange.

This appears framed as well (ie the inclusion of "something"), so this is indeed a valuable question from my perspective. That aside, I'd think one consideration in asking it would be to consider the peer review factor, comparable to what within such Nutrition sources?

peace?
Back to top Go down
View user profile
NonEntity



Number of posts: 2598
Registration date: 2007-11-08

PostSubject: Re: Vaccination information   Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:33 pm

eye2i2 wrote:
I'd think one consideration in asking it would be to consider the peer review factor, comparable to what within such Nutrition sources?

peace?


I infer from that statement that you seem to think that it is obvious that there is a great deal more peer review in the medical field than in the nutrition field. I don't know if that is what you intended to convery because you didn't say so, but that is what it appears to me.

Going with that assumption, I suggest that Ayurvedic medicine, Traditional Chinese medicine and a great history of folk remedies are mostly nutritionally based. It also appears that the modern western medical paradigm places virtually no emphasis on the study of nutrition and how it relates to health. It also appears that for the most part the government regulation of health care virtually excludes any serious consideration of all of the above modalities which focus on nutrition.

Assuming what I'm saying has some validity, it would appear to me that the assumption you are making is not valid. And, let's be clear, there is virtually NO PROFIT in nutritional therapy, so "cui bono" is certainly a factor worth consideration in this investigation.

- NonE
Back to top Go down
View user profile
NonEntity



Number of posts: 2598
Registration date: 2007-11-08

PostSubject: Re: Vaccination information   Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:26 am

For your perusal (from Dr. Mercola)...

Warning: Swine Flu Shot Linked to Killer Nerve Disease


Quote:
More people died from the vaccination than from swine flu.


Quote:
A warning that the swine flu vaccine has been linked to a deadly nerve disease has been sent by the UK Government to senior neurologists in a confidential letter.

The letter from the Health Protection Agency, the official body that oversees public health, was leaked to The Daily Mail, leading to demands to know why the information has not been given to the public before the vaccination of millions of people, including children, begins.

more...


- NonE
Back to top Go down
View user profile
eye2i2



Number of posts: 697
Age: 56
Location: southeastern north america ;)
Registration date: 2008-09-02

PostSubject: Re: Vaccination information   Tue Sep 01, 2009 1:22 pm

NonEntity wrote:
For your perusal (from Dr. Mercola)...

Duly noted as notified...
(but also counter-noting that nary a claim in the article is cross-referenced...? I mean really, how much is that to ask?)

Per the link above's linked source:

Quote:
A warning that the new swine flu jab is linked to a deadly nerve disease has been sent by the Government to senior neurologists in a confidential letter.

The letter from the Health Protection Agency, the official body that oversees public health, has been leaked to The Mail on Sunday

How convenient is that? (how potentially sinister is that seems to remain unknown, relevant to which side one is considering)

Quote:
Warning: Swine Flu Shot Linked to Killer Nerve Disease

Might one be a little bit concerned that the link above's linked/credited source has as it's side panel the following:
Quote:
> Britney Spears and sister Jamie Lynn chill out in the Miami heat Siblings spent the day by the pool with their children and mother Lynne
> 'I was raped more than once,' declares Katie Price She spoke out after allegations that her boyfriend stars in a film which glorifies rape
> Pixie and Peaches Geldof head for the Med to take a break from the London clubbing scene Bob's daughters hit the beach on the Spanish island of Majorca
> Hello boys, I'm back! Danniella Westbrook dances on the table as Sam Mitchell returns to EastEnders For a girl on the run, she certainly isn't laying low
> Geri Halliwell shows off her tan lines... at the dinner table While her aristocratic lover was dressed in shorts and a shirt, she just wore a white bikini
> Megan Fox shows off her dark side as she taps into the spirit of the Eighties for photo shoot Transformers beauty modelled for a magazine
> Ex-EastEnder Kara Tointon shows off her toned body in new lingerie ads The 26-year-old actress is preparing to do the Great North Run
> I want more children, says Charlotte Church as baby son Dexter is christened Singer and boyfriend Gavin were all smiles at church service
> I so love my life! Mel B savours champagne-fuelled holiday in the sun She relaxed on a luxury yacht in Colombia with husband Stephen Belafonte
> Baywatch babe Britton shows off her trim figure in a wetsuit Slimmed-down Fern played action mum as she went surfing in Cornwall
> I feel better about my body than I did at 40: Loose Woman Denise Welch, 51, poses for nude photoshoot You'd certainly never call Denise shy
> Eternally youthful Demi Moore, 46, denies having ANY plastic surgery Actress also said she had considered having a child with her toyboy lover Ashton Kutcher
> Hemlines on the up as age at which women dare to bare in a miniskirt jumps 10 years Women are happy to bare a lot of leg right up to the age of 40
> Two Fat Ladies chef Clarissa Dickson-Wright admits attending hare coursing event at private prosecution
> Gordon Ramsay restaurants shamed for 'dreary' atmosphere and 'outrageous' prices in new food guide Harden's guide slates TV chef

Shocked
jus' sayin'... scratch
Back to top Go down
View user profile
NonEntity



Number of posts: 2598
Registration date: 2007-11-08

PostSubject: Re: Vaccination information   Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:00 pm

I had missed that part about Britney Spears...

Thanks!!!

- NonE lol!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Laird



Number of posts: 324
Age: 25
Location: Wilmington, DE (the first STATE, lol)
Registration date: 2007-12-28

PostSubject: Re: Vaccination information   Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:30 am

I dunno if all vaccines are bad, but there is certainly evidence of bad side effects from some vaccines. Given the circumstances with swine flu and the vaccine, I think it is more reasonable for me to avoid getting the shot.

I don't want to end up walking backwards!

Yeah, yeah. I know this in particular is a very rare case, but there is certainly evidence of other bad side effects from government vaccines.

_________________
[INSERT MEME HERE]
Back to top Go down
View user profile
 

Vaccination information

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions of this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Liberating Minds :: Intellectual :: Natural Sciences-
Post new topic   Reply to topic