You can't offend me.
I love to hear opinions that are not mine.
Sounds good.

I love this site. I used to hang at FDR a bit, but it was for me like stepping on egg shells (or Molyneux's dick?). I see a much greater freedom to discuss a variety of topics here, such as determinism/compatibilism, moral anti-realism/subjectivism, and hot sex.

BTW Nadine, I hope you are aware that simply engaging with people in this site is grounds for banning in FDR.

Why ?

thats just how they roll.

Not an acceptable answer.

What answer would you find acceptable?
That sums it up really well actually.


... I think Dyl is best equipped to answer this one...
At the very least it will be a thorough, comprehensive, passionate and ultimately entertaining answer.

I'm scared.

My impression of why Stefban would say he bans those posting here, is that he found the core, originating/original people here "aggressive" and "quarrelsome" --mixed in with "slanderous" (for the cult-calling), rather than "genuinely curious" and "cordial". I'd think that for yourself, Nadine, if found to be both here and on fdr, like I myself was at the time, it's guilt by association ie one being here confirms one's approval of that "bad behavior" as acceptable. [words in quotes my interpretational choices, not necessarily Stefbans]

On the cult=slander aspect, if memory serves me correctly, he said calling fdr a cult was akin to calling his wife a whore (something he takes as horrific/slanderous).

whateva'