Number of posts: 122
Registration date: 2010-02-08
Number of posts: 842
Registration date: 2008-03-25
|Subject: Re: Here we go again: another UPB critique thread Mon Dec 12, 2011 5:54 pm|| |
I started following this one yesterday, too. Favorite line so far: "Point of clarification, people: OP is arguing against some of the fallacious proofs for UPB, but not against the metamoral system itself, which (I think) he believes true, and so do I."
At least I can give RODF props for admitting the logic of UPB is a mess. I wish I could understand how they can accept on faith a book that claims to be about logic. Those crazy kids.
Reminder to everyone that Molyneux kicked bake for not asking him questions in a respectful and deferential manner. This guy isn't exactly being polite.
Here's a nullrefer link to the thread for those who want to play it safe: UPB: critique up to page 46, bad (no) foundations